TY - JOUR AU - de Jesus, Victor Hugo Fonseca AU - Camandaroba, Marcos Pedro Guedes AU - Donadio, Mauro Daniel Spina AU - Cabral, Audrey AU - Muniz, Thiago Pimentel AU - de Moura Leite, Luciana AU - Sant’Ana, Lucas Ferreira PY - 2018 TI - Retrospective analysis of efficacy and safety of Gemcitabinebased chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma experiencing disease progression on FOLFIRINOX JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology; Vol 9, No 5 (October 01, 2018): Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (Management of Foregut Malignancies and Hepatobiliary Tract and Pancreas Malignancies) Y2 - 2018 KW - N2 - Background: Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA) represents a highly lethal condition. Despite the improvements seen with FOLFIRINOX, there is no randomized data to guide treatment selection beyond this regimen. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with MPA progressing on FOLFIRINOX who were treated with Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy afterwards. Methods: We included patients aged 18 years or older, treated for MPA with FOLFIRINOX in the first-line setting and who experienced disease progression, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0–2, and treated with at least one cycle of Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in second or further lines of treatment. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the study population and Cox proportional-hazards models to describe factors associated with survival. As an exploratory analysis, we compared the outcomes of patients treated with single-agent Gemcitabine with those of patients undergoing Gemcitabine-based polychemotherapy. Results: The study population consisted of 42 patients. Median age was 59 years and 78.6% of patients presented ECOG 0–1. Thirty-three patients (78.6%) were treated with Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in the second-line setting and 27 patients (64.3%) were treated with single-agent Gemcitabine. Objective response rate and disease control rate were 2.4% and 33.4%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 2.9 and 5.5 months, respectively. Six-month PFS and OS rates were 19.2% and 46.2%, respectively. We observed no significant difference in OS according to the type of Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, despite numerically improved disease control rate and PFS for those treated with Gemcitabine-based polychemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, ECOG 2 ( vs. ECOG 0–1) was the only factor significantly associated with inferior PFS and OS. Conclusions: a subgroup of patients with MPA derives benefit from treatment with Gemcitabine-based regimens after FOLFIRINOX. There is a suggestion that Gemcitabine-based combinations, in particular Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel, provide superior outcomes compared to single-agent Gemcitabine. Additionally, treatment in this setting should be offered carefully to patients with ECOG 2, as they present shorter survival and increased risk of toxicity. UR - https://jgo.amegroups.org/article/view/22424