Postoperative management after hepatic resection
Review Article
Postoperative management after hepatic resection
Lindsay J. Wrighton, Karen R. O’Bosky, Jukes P. Namm, Maheswari Senthil
Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA
Corresponding to: Maheswari Senthil, MD. Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Loma Linda University, Coleman Pavilion, Room # 21112, 11175 Campus Street, Loma Linda, California, USA. Tel: 909-558-8390; Fax: 909-558-0236. Email: msenthil@llu.edu.
Abstract
Hepatic resection has become the mainstay of treatment for both primary and certain secondary malignancies. Outcomes after hepatic resection have significantly improved with advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques and perioperative care. Metabolic and functional changes after hepatic resection are unique and cause significant challenges in management. In-depth understanding of hepatic physiology is essential to properly address the postoperative issues. Strategies implemented in the postoperative period to improve outcomes include adequate nutritional support, proper glycemic control, and interventions to reduce postoperative infectious complications among several others. This review article focuses on the major postoperative issues after hepatic resection and presents the current management.
Key words
Management; postoperative; hepatic resection; liver resection
J Gastrointest Oncol 2012;3:41-47. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.003
Introduction
Outcomes after hepatic resection have signif icantly improved over the last few decades (1-4). Although, no single factor is solely responsible, overall advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques, better understanding of hepatic physiology and improvement in perioperative management have all been contributory. Majority of postoperative management issues after liver resection are unique and require a thorough understanding of liver metabolism and the pathophysiology of liver disease. The purpose of this review is to elaborate on specific early postoperative management issues after liver resection, examine current evidence and present the management options.
Fluid and Electrolyte management
The immediate postoperative period after hepatic resection is characterized by fluid and electrolyte imbalances that are further accentuated by derangements of liver function. Maintenance of adequate f luid balance and normal renal function is critical. Cirrhotics are prone to f luid shifts, vasodilation and resultant hypotension. In this setting, colloids rather than crystalloids should be administered to restore intravascular volume. New onset postoperative ascites frequently occurs in cirrhotic patients. Management with sodium restriction and judicious use of diuretic therapy is recommended. Paracentesis may be necessary to prevent tense ascites.
Hyperlactemia and hypophosphatemia are common derangements in patients undergoing liver resection. Gluconeogenesis carried out by the liver normally consumes 40-60% of lactate. When the liver is damaged or stressed, it produces lactate rather than metabolizing it. Watanabe, et al., examined the relationship between lactate and base excess with clinical outcomes in 151 hepatic resection patients. The initial arterial plasma lactate concentration was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors, and correlated with bilirubin levels and was an excellent independent predictor of morbidity and mortality. Due to the additive effects of lactate-containing intravenous solution, non-lactate containing solutions are recommended for postoperative use (5).
Hypophosphatemia
Hypophosphatemia is encountered in nearly all patients after major hepatic resection. The pathogenesis of hypophosphatemia after hepatic resection is poorly understood and is generally believed to be due to increased phosphate uptake by regenerating hepatocytes. However, recent work by several investigators has suggested that excessive urinary losses mediated by phosphaturic mediators termed phosphatonins might be responsible for post-hepatic resection hypophosphatemia (6,7). Whether this reflects an increased production of phosphaturic mediators by the injured liver versus decreased clearance of a circulating mediator by the remnant liver is unclear.
Hypophosphatemia results in impaired energy metabolism, leading to cellular dysfunction in many organ systems including respiratory failure, cardiac arrhythmias, hematologic dysfunction, insulin resistance, and neuromuscular dysfunction (8,9). Standard liver resection management includes adequate replacement of phosphate with supplementation of maintenance fluids with potassium phosphate and oral/parenteral replacement. Currently, management of hypophosphatemia relies on serum phosphate measurements, which may not be an accurate measure of actual intracellular phosphate levels due to intraextracellular shifts. Acidosis can cause a shift of intracellular phosphate to extracellular space resulting in normalization of extracellular phosphate levels. A lternatively, measurements of serum 2,3- diphosphoglycerol (DPG) and nucleotide breakdown products in the urine have been reported to be more sensitive physiologic markers of hypophosphatemia-related cellular stress. Persistently low serum 2,3-DPG levels and high nucleotide breakdown products in the urine would potentially indicate inadequate intracel lular phosphate replenishment (7). Fur ther validation studies are needed to assess the clinical utility of these measures in the management of hypophosphatemia. In summary, hypophosphatemia after hepatic resection can lead to deleterious consequences and should be properly addressed. Universally accepted method for investigation, optimal replacement and target serum levels are lacking. Future studies that further elucidate the pathophysiology of hypophosphatemia after hepatic resection might lead to better management.
Nutrition
The post-hepatic resection period is characterized by a catabolic state, often with glucose and electroly te imbalances as the body attempts to supply the high demand of the regenerating liver (10). Nutritional support during this critical period is of paramount importance to ensure adequate hepatic regeneration and postoperative-recovery. A perioperative nutritional plan should be devised for each individual patient based on the nutritional status and hepatic function. Non-cirrhotic patients with adequate preoperative nutritional status may not require any special intervention and should be started on early oral/enteral diet. On the other hand, patients who are either malnourished, with or without compromised liver function (cirrhosis or steatosis) and who undergo major hepatic resection will benefit from perioperative nutritional support preferably through enteral route. The benefit of early enteral nutrition has now been firmly established in a wide variety of surgical patients. Richter, et al. (11) evaluated five randomized controlled studies that compared enteral versus parenteral nutrition in the post-hepatic resection patients (12-16). Based on the results, the authors concluded that enteral nutrition resulted in significantly lower rate of wound infections and catheter related complications than parenteral nutrition. While there was no difference in mortality, patients receiving enteral nutrition showed better post-operative immune competence as evidenced by decreased post-operative infectious complications. Hotta, et al. found that supplementation with TPN had no effect on the post-operative outcomes (17). Current evidence strongly supports the use of enteral route for nutritional support unless otherwise contraindicated.
In addition to early enteral nutrition, branched chain amino acids and other immune-enhancing agents have received recent attention and deserve special mention. Liver disease results in altered amino acid metabolism characterized by low circulating levels of branched chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine and valine), elevated circulating levels of methionine and aromatic amino acids. Results from two large randomized controlled trials have shown that branched chain amino acids (BCAA) supplementation in patients with advanced cirrhosis was associated with improved nutritional status and decreased frequency of complications of cirrhosis (18,19). Okabayashi et al. evaluated the impact of oral supplementation of branched chain amino acids and carbohydrates on quality of life (QOL) measures in patients undergoing hepatic resection (20). In this study QOL measures was assessed by subjective perception of functioning and physical, mental, and social well-being and were evaluated before and after surgery, up to 12 months post-operatively. The BCAA group showed steadily improving QOL measures from pre-operative measurements - this trend continued 12 months post-operatively even after supplements had been discontinued, while the control group showed no change. The authors concluded that nutritional supplementation with BCAA restored nutritional status and “whole-body kinetics” in patients following hepatic resection, with subjective improvement in post-operative quality of life. In animal studies, BCAA supplementation has been shown to promote liver regeneration after major hepatic resection (21). Ishikawa et al. demonstrated that short-term supplementation with BCAA was associated with higher serum er y thropoietin levels in non-hepatitis patients undergoing curative hepatic resection (22). It is hypothesized that higher erythropoietin levels might be beneficial in protecting liver cells from ischemic injury. Recent randomized study in patients undergoing radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma reported that BCAA supplementation might be beneficial (23). Currently there is reasonable evidence to support the use of BCAA supplementation in patients undergoing liver resection particularly in patients with chronic liver disease.
Carefully devised nutritional plan based on patient’s overall clinical condition and degree of malnutrition is essential. Adequate perioperative nutritional support and institution of early enteral nutrition are crucial. Specialized nutrients such as BCAA might be beneficial in select subset of patients.
Glycemic control
Hyperglycemia induced by surgical stress causes dysregulation of liver metabolism and immune function, resulting in adverse postoperative outcomes (24,25). Strict control of blood glucose by intensive insulin therapy in surgical patients admitted to intensive care unit has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality (26). Insulin resistance after liver resection can make adequate blood glucose control challenging. Interventions to achieve tight blood glucose control without increasing the incidence of severe hypoglycemia are being evaluated by several investigators. Okabayashi et al. examined the use of continuous blood glucose monitoring with closed loop insulin administration system, a type of artificial pancreas (STG-22, Nikkiso, Tokyo, Japan) in patients undergoing hepatic resection. Although the closed looped insulin administration system was reported to be safe and effective, the mean blood glucose level remained above the target range of 90-110 mg/dl (27). Fisette et al. evaluated the use hyperinsulinemic-normoglycemic clamp technique with 24-h preoperative carbohydrate load (intervention) or standard glucose control through insulin sliding scale treatment (control) in patients undergoing hepatic resection. The hyperinsulinemic-normoglycemic clamp technique reduced post-operative liver dysfunction, infections, and complications when compared to insulin sliding scale (28). Many different strategies have been proposed to achieve tight glucose control in hepatic resection patients. Adoption of a particular glycemic control technique requires an institution wide, standardized, multi-team approach to achieve optimal results.
Coagulopathy
Derangements in conventional markers of coagulation such as PT/INR, PTT and platelet count are common post hepatectomy and correlates with the extent of resection. Multiple studies have noted a postoperative increase in INR between postoperative day one and five and a corresponding decrease in platelet count and fibrinogen (29-32). This is thought to be due to decreased synthetic function of the remnant liver as well as hemodilution and consumption of clotting factors. Postoperative coagulopathy peaks 2-5 days post surgery.
Prolongation of PT/INR is often self-limited and usually resolves without the need for transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in non-cirrhotics. Prophylactic administration of fresh frozen plasma to avoid postoperative bleeding has been reported by several centers. Martin et al. from Memorial Sloan Kettering cancer center reported their experience with prophylactic FFP transfusions for prothrombin time >16 seconds in patients undergoing major liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. In this study of 260 patients, 83 patients (32%) received FFP. One patient (0.4%) needed reoperation for postoperative bleeding. There were no major transfusion related complications (33). Although the incidence of postoperative bleeding is extremely low in this study, it is unclear if this is due to the aggressive prophylactic use of FFP or better surgical technique. Other centers have reported prophylactic use of FFP for INR above 2.0. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the criteria for prophylactic FFP transfusion after hepatic resection. Cirrhotics are at increased risk of bleeding after resection. A combination of FFP transfusions, vitamin K, octreotide and human r FVIIa may be utilized to correct coagulopathy and prevent bleeding.
Pain management
Optimal postoperative pain control is necessary for early mobilization and improved respiratory function. Postoperative pain management begins with preoperative planning and formulating a pain management plan that is tailored to an individual patient’s liver function, respiratory and coagulation status, comorbidities, and extent of resection. Opioids are the mainstay of postoperative pain control. The most common opioids used are morphine, hydromorphone, and fentanyl. Side effects of opioid administration include sedation, respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, constipation, hypotension and exacerbation of hepatic encephalopathy. Cirrhotic patients have increased bioavailability of opioids and benzodiazepines due to decreased drug metabolism in the liver resulting in drug accumulation. The size of liver resection has been correlated to the impairment of opioid metabolism, larger volume resections result in greater impairment of opioid metabolism (34). Morphine is poorly excreted in the setting of renal failure. Hydromorphone and fentanyl elimination is less affected by renal impairment (35) and serve as better alternatives in cirrhotic patients with renal dysfunction. Although opioids are frequently used in patients undergoing hepatic resection, the importance of close monitoring for drug overdose and side effects cannot be overstressed.
Epidural anesthesia is an effective pain management option and adjunct to intravenous opioids for large abdominal operations. It helps to reduce the pulmonary complications, duration of ileus and provides better pain control than opioids alone (36,37). Risks associated with epidural catheter placement include epidural hematoma, epidural abscess, and spinal cord injury. These risks are increased post hepatectomy due to alterations in coagulation profile. Postoperative coagulopathy is at its peak 2-5 days post surgery. This time frame coincides with the recommended time of removal for epidural catheters and may necessitate transfusion of fresh frozen plasma and/ or platelets (32,38-40). Due to these risks, the role of single dose epidural shots has been examined. Ko et al. reported that the combination of single intrathecal injection of morphine combined with postoperative patient controlled analgesia (PCA) resulted in improved pain control in the early postoperative period than PCA alone (41). Epidural catheter use in hepatic resection has also been associated with greater transfusion requirement (see Page and Kooby, this issue).
There are other drugs that may be useful as adjuncts to opioid administration. Intravenous acetaminophen has recently become available in the United States. The recommended maximal dose is 2g/day in patients with hepatic impairment (35). NSAID use is generally not recommended post hepatectomy, in cirrhotic patients, or in patients with renal insufficiency due to the risks of bleeding and hepatorenal syndrome (35,42). Other non-opioid analgesics such as nefopam is widely used in European countries but is not currently FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved for routine use in United States.
The use of local anesthetic infusions via the On-Q Pain Buster system placed in the musculofascial layer of the subcostal wound combined with PCA decreased total morphine consumption and improved pain at rest and after spirometry when compared to PCA alone in patients who underwent open hepatic resection (43). An infusion of no more than 0.25% ropivacaine or duration of infusion of less than 2 days is recommended due to increased plasma levels post hepatectomy. There are also case reports of the use of paravertebral infusion of local anesthetic with PCA. However comparative studies are needed prior to routine use of this technique (44).
There are many options available for post hepatectomy pain control. A multimodal approach specifically chosen for an individual patient is recommended and may consist of intravenous opioids, non-opioid injectables, continuous or single dose epidural anesthesia, and local anesthetic infusions with the transition to oral opioids as tolerated.
Postoperative infection
Infection after hepatic resection is a major contributor of postoperative morbidity and mortality and might be predictive of long-term outcomes (45). Risk factors predictive of postoperative infectious complications are obesity, preoperative biliary drainage, extent of hepatic resection, operative blood loss, comorbid conditions and postoperative bile leak (46-49). Shorter operating times and meticulous surgical technique to decrease operative blood loss and postoperative bile leak may help reduce the incidence of both the infectious and non-infectious complication after liver resection. Standard measures to reduce the incidence of postoperative infectious complications such as early mobilization, proper care and removal of central venous catheters and aggressive pulmonary toilet should be routine in the postoperative period. Early recognition of postoperative infection, prompt institution of broad-spectrum antibiotics and aggressive source control is of utmost importance. A recent study by Garwood et al found that delay in antibiotic therapy was associated with increased infectious mortality (49).
Among the interventions investigated to reduce the postoperative infections, synbiotic treatment has recently emerged as a promising approach. The concept of gutmediated SIRS and end organ injury after major traumatic insult is now well established. Studies in patients undergoing liver resection have shown that disruption of gut barrier function and intestinal microbial balance can result in systemic inflammation and lead to infectious complications (50,51). Strategies such as early enteral nutrition are aimed to protect the gut-barrier function and reduce infectious complication. Synbiotic treatment helps improve intestinal microbial balance and reduce postoperative infectious complications. Pro-biotics are viable bacteria that benefit the host by improving the intestinal microbial balance and are studied for their effects on gut flora and impact on the immune system. Prebiotics are a group of non-digestive food constituents that selectively alter the growth and activity of colonic flora. Combination of pro- and prebiotics is termed the synbiotic therapy. Usami et al. examined the role of perioperative synbiotic treatment in patients undergoing hepatic resection. In this study, patients were randomized to receive either oral synbiotics or no synbiotics during the perioperative period. Perioperative synbiotic treatment attenuated the decrease in intestinal integrity as evidenced by decreased serum diamine oxidase levels (DAO) and reduced the rate of infectious complications (0% vs. 17.2% in the control group) (52). Sugawara et al reported similar results from a study comparing perioperative synbiotics therapy with postoperative synbiotic therapy. Overall infectious complication rate was 12.1% in the perioperative synbiotic group vs. 30% in the control group (53). Administration of synbiotics is simple and safe and can be utilized in patients undergoing major hepatic resection.
Thromboprophylaxis
The prevalence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolus (PE), in general surgery patients is 15-40% and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and increased length of hospital stay (54). Early mobilization, intermittent pneumatic compression devices and pharmacologic agents are used to prevent VTE. While pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis is widely accepted for most general surgery procedures, the fear of bleeding after major hepatectomy has limited its use (55). On the contrary, it is now evident that partial hepatectomy patients are in fact hypercoagulable. This hypercoagulability is a result of many factors including tissue trauma, decreased synthesis of factors involved in the clotting cascade by the remnant liver, blood loss, hemodilution, increased acute phase response, malignant diagnosis, prior chemotherapy, increased age, long anesthetic times, and limited postoperative mobility (26,54,55).
The reduced volume of liver not only results in reduced synthesis of procoagulants but the levels of anticoagulants: protein C, S and antithrombin decrease by more than 50%. Von Willebrand factor and factor VIII levels are increased especially in larger resections likely due to surgical trauma. Prothombotic markers sP-Selectin and thrombin-antithrombin complexes are also significantly increased post hepatectomy. Decreased anticoagulant levels combined with increased von Willebrand factor and factor VIII produce a prothrombotic milieu that persists on postoperative day 5 when most INR values have normalized (30). Thromboelastogram monitoring also demonstrates a state of postoperative hypercoagulability after living donor hepatectomy (31). VTE may occur in the presence of elevated standard measures of anticoagulation such as INR and PTT (56,57). A higher incidence of VTE has been noted in patients not receiving thromboprophylaxis the night of surgery (29). In a retrospective review of 415 patients undergoing major hepatectomy administration of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis lowered the rate of VTE but did not increase the rate of red blood cell transfusion post hepatectomy (55). Pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis should be administered starting the day of surgery unless high risk of bleeding exists.
Conclusion
Postoperative management after hepatic resection is challenging. Complex resections are being increasingly performed in high risk and older patient population. A well-devised, customized management approach based on patient’s overall condition, liver function, and nutritional status is vital to reduce postoperative complications and to achieve optimal outcomes.
References
  • Belghiti J, Hiramatsu K, Benoist S, Massault P, Sauvanet A, Farges O. Seven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection. J Am Coll Surg 2000;191:38- 46.[LinkOut]
  • Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S, et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 2002;236:397-406; discussion 406-7.[LinkOut]
  • Melendez JA, Arslan V, Fischer ME, Wuest D, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, et al. Perioperative outcomes of major hepatic resections under low central venous pressure anesthesia: blood loss, blood transfusion, and the risk of postoperative renal dysfunction. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:620-5.[LinkOut]
  • Ryan WH, Hummel BW, McClelland RN. Reduction in the morbidity and mortality of major hepatic resection. Experience with 52 patients. Am J Surg 1982;144:740-3.[LinkOut]
  • Watanabe I, Mayumi T, Arishima T, Takahashi H, Shikano T, Nakao A, et al. Hyperlactemia can predict the prognosis of liver resection. Shock 2007;28:35-8.[LinkOut]
  • Salem RR, Tray K. Hepatic resection-related hypophosphatemia is of renal origin as manifested by isolated hyperphosphaturia. Ann Surg 2005;241:343-8.[LinkOut]
  • Datta HK, Malik M, Neely RD. Hepatic surgery-related hypophosphatemia. Clin Chim Acta 2007;380:13-23.[LinkOut]
  • Geerse DA, Bindels AJ, Kuiper MA, Roos AN, Spronk PE, Schultz MJ. Treatment of hypophosphatemia in the intensive care unit: a review. Crit Care 2010;14:R147.[LinkOut]
  • Shor R, Halabe A, Rishver S, Tilis Y, Matas Z, Fux A, et al. Severe hypophosphatemia in sepsis as a mortality predictor. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2006;36:67-72.[LinkOut]
  • Ciuni R, Biondi A, Grosso G, Nunnari G, Panascia E, Randisi L, et al. Nutritional aspects in patient undergoing liver resection. Updates Surg 2011;63:249-52.[LinkOut]
  • Richter B, Schmandra TC, Golling M, Bechstein WO. Nutritional support after open liver resection: a systematic review. Dig Surg 2006;23:139-45.[LinkOut]
  • Shirabe K, Matsumata T, Shimada M, Takenaka K, Kawahara N, Yamamoto K, et al. A comparison of parenteral hyperalimentation and early enteral feeding regarding systemic immunity after major hepatic resection--the results of a randomized prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 1997;44:205-9.[LinkOut]
  • Mochizuki H, Togo S, Tanaka K, Endo I, Shimada H. Early enteral nutrition after hepatectomy to prevent postoperative infection. Hepatogastroenterology 2000;47:1407-10.[LinkOut]
  • Hu QG, Zheng QC. The influence of Enteral Nutrition in postoperative patients with poor liver function. World J Gastroenterol 2003;9:843-6.[LinkOut]
  • Nishizaki T, Takenaka K, Yanaga K, Shimada M, Shirabe K, Matsumata T, et al. Nutritional support after hepatic resection: a randomized prospective study. Hepatogastroenterology 1996;43:608-13.[LinkOut]
  • Fan ST, Lo CM, Lai EC, Chu KM, Liu CL, Wong J. Perioperative nutritional support in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1547-52.[LinkOut]
  • Hotta T, Kobayashi Y, Taniguchi K, Johata K, Sahara M, Naka T, et al. Evaluation of postoperative nutritional state after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2003;50:1511-6.[LinkOut]
  • Marchesini G, Bianchi G, Merli M, Amodio P, Panella C, Loguercio C, et al. Nutritional supplementation with branched-chain amino acids in advanced cirrhosis: a double-blind, randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2003;124:1792-801.[LinkOut]
  • Muto Y, Sato S, Watanabe A, Moriwaki H, Suzuki K, Kato A, et al. Effects of oral branched-chain amino acid granules on event-free survival in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;3:705-13.[LinkOut]
  • Okabayashi T, Iyoki M, Sugimoto T, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K. Oral supplementation with carbohydrate- and branched-chain amino acidenriched nutrients improves postoperative quality of life in patients undergoing hepatic resection. Amino Acids 2011;40:1213-20.[LinkOut]
  • Kim SJ, Kim DG, Lee MD. Effects of branched-chain amino acid infusions on liver regeneration and plasma amino acid patterns in partially hepatectomized rats. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58:1280- 5.[LinkOut]
  • Ishikawa Y, Yoshida H, Mamada Y, Taniai N, Matsumoto S, Bando K, et al. Prospective randomized controlled study of short-term perioperative oral nutrition with branched chain amino acids in patients undergoing liver surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 2010;57:583-90.[LinkOut]
  • Lee IJ, Seong J, Bae JI, You SH, Rhee Y, Lee JH. Effect of Oral Supplementation with Branched-chain Amino Acid (BCAA) during Radiotherapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Double- Blind Randomized Study. Cancer Res Treat 2011;43:24-31.[LinkOut]
  • Huo TI, Lui WY, Huang YH, Chau GY, Wu JC, Lee PC, et al. Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for hepatic decompensation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing resection: a longitudinal study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2293-8.[LinkOut]
  • Little SA, Jarnagin WR, DeMatteo RP, Blumgart LH, Fong Y. Diabetes is associated with increased perioperative mortality but equivalent long-term outcome after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6:88-94.[LinkOut]
  • van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1359-67.[LinkOut]
  • Okabayashi T, Hnazaki K, Nishimori I, Sugimoto T, Maeda H, Yatabe T, et al. Continuous post-operative blood glucose monitoring and control using a closed-loop system in patients undergoing hepatic resection. Dig Dis Sci 2008;53:1405-10.[LinkOut]
  • Fisette A, Hassanain M, Metrakos P, Doi SA, Salman A, Schricker T, et al. High-Dose Insulin Therapy Reduces Postoperative Liver Dysfunction and Complications in Liver Resection Patients through Reduced Apoptosis and Altered Inflammation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:217-26.[LinkOut]
  • De Pietri L, Montalti R, Begliomini B, Scaglioni G, Marconi G, Reggiani A, et al. Thromboelastographic changes in liver and pancreatic cancer surgery: hypercoagulability, hypocoagulability or normocoagulability? Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:608-16.[LinkOut]
  • Bezeaud A, Denninger MH, Dondero F, Saada V, Venisse L, Huisse MG, et al. Hypercoagulability after partial liver resection. Thromb Haemost 2007;98:1252-6.[LinkOut]
  • Cerutti E, Stratta C, Romagnoli R, Schellino MM, Skurzak S, Rizzetto M, et al. Thromboelastogram monitoring in the perioperative period of hepatectomy for adult living liver donation. Liver Transpl 2004;10:289- 94.[LinkOut]
  • Shontz R, Karuparthy V, Temple R, Brennan TJ. Prevalence and risk factors predisposing to coagulopathy in patients receiving epidural analgesia for hepatic surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2009;34:308-11.[LinkOut]
  • Martin RC 2nd, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y, Biernacki P, Blumgart LH, DeMatteo RP. The use of fresh frozen plasma after major hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: is there a standard for transfusion? J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:402-9.[LinkOut]
  • Rudin A, Lundberg JF, Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Flisberg P, Werner MU. Morphine metabolism after major liver surgery. Anesth Analg 2007;104:1409-14, table of contents.[LinkOut]
  • Chandok N, Watt KD. Pain management in the cirrhotic patient: the clinical challenge. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:451-8.[LinkOut]
  • Werawatganon T, Charuluxanun S. Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;1:CD004088.[LinkOut]
  • Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, deFerranti S, Suarez T, Lau J, Chalmers TC, et al. The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 1998;86:598-612.[LinkOut]
  • Schumann R, Zabala L, Angelis M, Bonney I, Tighiouart H, Carr DB. Altered hematologic profiles following donor right hepatectomy and implications for perioperative analgesic management. Liver Transpl 2004;10:363-8.[LinkOut]
  • Fazakas J, Tóth S, Füle B, Smudla A, Mándli T, Radnai M, et al. Epidural anesthesia? No of course. Transplant Proc 2008;40:1216-7.[LinkOut]
  • Page A, Rostad B, Staley CA, Levy JH, Park J, Goodman M, et al. Epidural analgesia in hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:1184- 92.[LinkOut]
  • Ko JS, Choi SJ, Gwak MS, Kim GS, Ahn HJ, Kim JA, et al. Intrathecal morphine combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia is an effective and safe method for immediate postoperative pain control in live liver donors. Liver Transpl 2009;15:381-9.[LinkOut]
  • Mimoz O, Incagnoli P, Josse C, Gillon MC, Kuhlman L, Mirand A, et al. Analgesic efficacy and safety of nefopam vs. propacetamol following hepatic resection. Anaesthesia 2001;56:520-5.[LinkOut]
  • Chan SK, Lai PB, Li PT, Wong J, Karmakar MK, Lee KF, et al. The analgesic efficacy of continuous wound instillation with ropivacaine after open hepatic surgery. Anaesthesia 2010;65:1180-6.[LinkOut]
  • Ho AM, Karmakar MK, Cheung M, Lam GC. Right thoracic paravertebral analgesia for hepatectomy. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:458-61.[LinkOut]
  • Neal CP, Mann CD, Garcea G, Briggs CD, Dennison AR, Berry DP. Preoperative systemic inflammation and infectious complications after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Arch Surg 2011;146:471-8.[LinkOut]
  • Kaibori M, Ishizaki M, Matsui K, Kwon AH. Postoperative infectious and non-infectious complications after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58:1747-56.[LinkOut]
  • Okabayashi T, Nishimori I, Yamashita K, Sugimoto T, Yatabe T, Maeda H, et al. Risk factors and predictors for surgical site infection after hepatic resection. J Hosp Infect 2009;73:47-53.[LinkOut]
  • Ferrero A, Lo Tesoriere R, Viganò L, Caggiano L, Sgotto E, Capussotti L. Preoperative biliary drainage increases infectious complications after hepatectomy for proximal bile duct tumor obstruction. World J Surg 2009;33:318-25.[LinkOut]
  • Garwood R A, Sawyer RG, Thompson L, Adams RB. Infectious complications after hepatic resection. Am Surg 2004;70:787-92.[LinkOut]
  • O’Keefe SJ, El-Zayadi AR, Carraher TE, Dav is M, Williams R. Malnutrition and immuno-incompetence in patients with liver disease. Lancet 1980;2:615-7.[LinkOut]
  • Yeh DC, Wu CC, Ho WM, Cheng SB, Lu IY, Liu TJ, et al. Bacterial translocation after cirrhotic liver resection: a clinical investigation of 181 patients. J Surg Res 2003;111:209-14.[LinkOut]
  • Usami M, Miyoshi M, Kanbara Y, Aoyama M, Sakaki H, Shuno K, et al. Effects of perioperative synbiotic treatment on infectious complications, intestinal integrity, and fecal flora and organic acids in hepatic surgery with or without cirrhosis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011;35:317-28.[LinkOut]
  • Sugawara G, Nagino M, Nishio H, Ebata T, Takagi K, Asahara T, et al. Perioperative synbiotic treatment to prevent postoperative infectious complications in biliary cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2006;244:706-14.[LinkOut]
  • Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Samama CM, Lassen MR, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008;133:381S-453S.[LinkOut]
  • Reddy SK, Turley RS, Barbas AS, Steel JL, Tsung A, Marsh JW, et al. Post-operative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis after major hepatectomy: does peripheral venous thromboembolism prevention outweigh bleeding risks? J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:1602-10.[LinkOut]
  • Senzolo M, Sartori MT, Lisman T. Should we give thromboprophylaxis to patients with liver cirrhosis and coagulopathy? HPB (Oxford) 2009;11:459-64.[LinkOut]
  • Lesmana CR, Inggriani S, Cahyadinata L, Lesmana LA. Deep vein thrombosis in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis: a rare condition? Hepatol Int 2010;4:433-8.[LinkOut]
Cite this article as: Wrighton LJ, O'Bosky KR, Namm JP, Senthil M. Postoperative management after hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Oncol 2012;3:41-47. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2012.003